Audit of draft coverage and transcript adherence

I audited the draft articles and timeline against the meeting transcript and the editorial rules provided. The following items were identified and addressed in the final revision.

spelling: [] clarity: [] chronology: [] framing: [] misinformation: [] misidentification: [{"type":"speaker_identity_incomplete","description":"The committee chair and several committee members are referred to by role or first name only in the transcript; full official names are not provided in the transcript. Articles use only full names when present and otherwise cite role titles (e.g., ‘Madam Chair’) to avoid misidentification.","severity":"medium"}] out_of_context: [] Quantitative precision: [{"type":"dated_quarter_numbers","description":"Several dollar totals were read from a Sept. 30 report and referenced in testimony; the transcript notes these figures will have changed since then. The articles state the date source and use rounded/approximate values where testimony specified the quarter.","severity":"medium"}] Process clarity: [] Context clarity: [] Agency clarity: [] Question emphasis: [] omission: [] bias: [] duplicate: []

Attribution lock: All direct quotes in the articles are attributed to speakers who are explicitly named in the transcript (Douglas Farnham, Adam Greshen, Jean Hamilton, Ornela Mata Figueroa). Where a committee member is referenced only by first name in the transcript, the article uses the role (Chair) or neutral phrasing rather than inventing full names.

Corrections made in revision: clarified that the chair’s name is not specified in the transcript; labelled financial figures as approximate where testimony tied them to a dated report; used only named speakers for direct quotes; preserved committee questions and requests for follow-up.