Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Review Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Clemente design reviewers give advisory tweaks for Rita Chiquita restaurant remodel
Summary
The Design Review Subcommittee reviewed development permit 25-488 for 424 N. El Pino, advising the applicant to emphasize mid‑century‑modern elements, align rooflines visually, include mechanical screening and integrated signage, and resolve ADA access details before planning commission review.
The Design Review Subcommittee of San Clemente City met Dec. 17, 2025, to provide advisory comments on development permit application 25-488 to convert the existing office at 424 North El Pino into a restaurant the applicant said will be named “Rita Chiquita.”
Staff presented the site plan, noted the building sits inside the city’s architectural overlay and described the existing building as mid‑century modern designed by Chris Abel; staff recommended preserving that character and making site improvements that complement the structure. Speaker 3 summarized the recommendation: "it would be more in character at this site to preserve the architectural design that's already there and create site improvements that complement that."
Subcommittee members emphasized visual cohesion. Speaker 1 said keeping horizontal roof elements would improve visual balance; staff relayed that their consultant suggested maintaining a consistent roofline across the three proposed structures. The applicant/designer signaled a different preference: "I totally disagree with tying those roofs together," (Speaker 5) and favored a simpler flat panel expression for the restroom element. Staff and members clarified intention: the recommendation was for similar height and style to read as a single composition, not necessarily physically connecting roofs.
Design details the subcommittee asked the applicant to address included: integrating a cantilevered or continuous fascia to create visual rhythm, using an appropriate base material (CMU, stone or equivalent) to anchor the composition, and considering post‑and‑beam 'spider leg' posts over the patio to create a covered walkway without structural changes to the original building.
Committee members also flagged practical and code issues. The group asked that elevations show the proposed sign and how mechanical equipment will be screened. Speakers raised ADA access constraints linked to the steep rear grade; Speaker 5 recalled a prior ramp solution of roughly 185 linear feet with multiple landings to surmount an 11‑foot grade change and noted a lift is likely the practical option. Members urged the project team to confirm sewer and grease‑trap tie‑ins and how kitchen ventilation will be screened.
On site and streetscape details, members recommended retaining or replacing the bamboo planter that currently encroaches into the public right‑of‑way per engineering staff, preserving landscape that shields El Camino Real where practicable, and using open glass at the storefront so passersby can see activity inside.
The subcommittee reiterated its role as advisory: "we're not an approval body," Speaker 1 said, and suggested the applicant return to planning commission for formal action after incorporating the requested clarifications and sketches. The applicant was invited to submit sketches and color renderings for informal review before the planning‑commission hearing.
With no other business, Speaker 2 moved to adjourn and proposed the next regular meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee for Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026, at 3 p.m.; the motion was seconded and the meeting was adjourned.
What’s next: the applicant is expected to revise plans to show the sign on elevations, provide mechanical‑equipment screening details, finalize ADA access approach, and submit color/rendering studies before the planning commission hearing.
