Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

San Diego Water District approves design‑build contract to begin advanced metering infrastructure program

San Diego Water District Board · December 18, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board authorized the general manager to execute a design‑build agreement with Ferguson Enterprises for Phase 1 design of an AMI program (Phase 1 ≈ $850,953; design work and replacement of ~1,178 meters). Phase 2 (construction/GMP) will return to the board.

The San Diego Water District Board unanimously authorized the general manager to execute a design‑build agreement with Ferguson Enterprises to begin a phased advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) program, approving a Phase 1 design contract of roughly $850,953.

Principal Engineer Alex described the district’s existing metering baseline — roughly 14,350 meters serving about 40,000 customers, with approximately 10,600 meters (75%) installed before 2010 and about 3,800 AMR meters currently non‑transmitting. Alex told the board Phase 1 is primarily design and software integration with the district’s billing system, and that the Phase 1 scope includes replacing about 1,178 legacy AMR meters and designing the fixed AMI network.

Alex said the district used a progressive design‑build procurement approach (two‑step RFQ/RFP, best‑value selection) and that a selection panel recommended Ferguson because of coastal‑zone experience and a dual AMR/AMI capability they previously used in Oceanside. Ferguson’s approach, Alex said, includes solar‑powered gateways (no new structures or antennas) and an estimated 19 gateways if the system were fully implemented; final gateway counts will be confirmed during Phase 1 design.

Alex also updated the board on a Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART grant application (50% up to $1,000,000) that could offset Phase 2 implementation; he said announcements had been delayed due to federal grant pauses and a government shutdown.

Board members asked whether a formal cost‑benefit analysis had been completed (staff said no) and raised concerns about radio/backhaul longevity and the risk of carrier changes over time. One board member urged a pilot to test gateway/backhaul performance and battery life before wider implementation: “I think you probably need to get 1 gateway in there,” that member said. Alex confirmed Phase 1 is design only and that Phase 2 would return with a guaranteed maximum price for construction and implementation.

A board member moved to authorize the agreement with Ferguson, adopt a budget amendment and adopt a sole‑source resolution for Neptune Technology Group meters to ensure compatibility; the motion was seconded and carried unanimously. Staff will return with Phase 2 implementation plans, final gateway counts and any grant award details.