Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Rehabilitation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DRC supports significant rehabilitation at 1309 Adams Street despite exceeding guideline addition limits; requests detailed demolition methodology

Design Review Committee (Historic Zoning Commission subcommittee) · December 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners backed a large renovation and requested documentation showing what elements will be retained, foundation work, a clear demolition/rehabilitation plan, and Sanborn map evidence for proposed porch reconstruction; staff noted the 1,238 sq ft addition equals 55% of the footprint, exceeding guideline thresholds.

The Design Review Committee reviewed plans for 1309 Adams Street, a deteriorated early-20th-century house, and heard that the applicant proposes extensive rehabilitation including removing nonoriginal vinyl cladding, reconstructing a front porch, and adding 1,238 square feet to the existing 2,234-square-foot footprint. Applicant Benjamin McCreary acknowledged much of the structure is compromised by termite damage, failing foundations and interior deterioration.

Staff flagged the proposed addition as 55% of the historic footprint — beyond the guideline recommended maximum — and said additional documentation (Sanborn maps, roof pitches, detailed material lists and scope clarifications) is needed to evaluate whether the work aligns with rehabilitation standards rather than a de facto demolition. Several commissioners signaled sympathy for exceeding size thresholds given the house’s lot size and condition and supported a measured, well-documented approach to preservation where possible.

Commissioners requested a demolition/rehabilitation methodology, shoring and sequencing exhibits, a window-by-window plan for retention or replication, and discussions with building codes staff about foundation work. Applicant said they will pursue documentation and work with preservation tax-credit advisors to maximize retention where feasible.

Next steps: applicant to provide Sanborn map evidence, detailed scope of work, window and foundation plans, and shoring/demo sequencing to allow staff to assess COA eligibility and to coordinate with building-code/zoning staff.