Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Dual Language topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Yakima board: dual‑language access exceeds target while participation gaps remain

Yakima School District Board of Directors · October 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District officials reported 85% of PK–5 schools now offer two‑way dual‑language programs, increases in world‑language enrollment, but persistent participation disparities by income, English‑learner and migrant status.

The Yakima School District reported progress toward its bilingual/biliteracy goal on Oct. 21 while flagging inequities in program participation.

Dr. Lucero, assistant superintendent of teaching and learning, told the board the district has exceeded its dual‑language goal: 12 of 14 pre‑K through fifth‑grade schools (85%) now have access to two‑way dual‑language programs. The district plans to implement dual language at Nob Hill and Roosevelt in 2025–26 and is phasing cohort expansions; one cohort delayed first‑grade implementation this year due to a 2024 pause.

Lucero said district and STAR/hidden slides show world‑language enrollment rose from about 15.4% (2022–23) to 24.2% (2024–25). However, gaps persist: low‑income students participated at 17% versus 8% for non‑low‑income; English‑language learners participated at 5% versus 20% for non‑ELL students; migrant students participated at 3% versus 22% for non‑migrant students. Lucero said a Goal 4 committee is revising measurements to include sociocultural competence and will return with an update on Nov. 18.

Board members asked whether American Sign Language (ASL) counts as a world language and how sociocultural competence will be measured; Lucero offered to provide the ASL information and described training and next steps for developing metrics.

The report was informational; no board action was taken.