Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transmission Line topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Erath County commissioners work on engineer-backed resolution over proposed 765 kV transmission line; no vote yet

Erath County Commissioners Court · December 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County officials said they are drafting a detailed, engineer-supported resolution to file with the Public Utility Commission opposing the proposed 765 kV transmission project, citing potential harm to emergency radio communications and property values; the court took no formal action on the resolution at the Dec. 8 meeting.

Erath County commissioners said Dec. 8 they are preparing a targeted, engineer-backed resolution to file with the Public Utility Commission (PUC) opposing the proposed ‘‘Dinosaur Long Short 765 kV’’ transmission project and its potential effects on county radio communications and property owners.

The court reviewed preliminary engineering findings and communications maps and said staff and outside engineers were working to craft language that will be more specific than earlier, generic resolutions. The presiding official told the court the draft will include calculated information from engineers and input from the county communications team and a county staff member identified in the record as Miss Espinosa.

Why it matters: commissioners framed the effort as twofold — to protect county radio ‘‘talk paths’’ that support emergency communications and to document potential property-value and environmental impacts when the county files with the PUC. A technical speaker described tower-height ranges and told the court that the proposed paths cross multiple county talk paths, increasing the risk of disrupted emergency radio links.

The court emphasized the strategy of submitting detailed technical evidence rather than assuming the PUC will consider general claims. ‘‘We feel like . . . our talk paths . . . is what we’re pushing with,’’ a technical participant said during the discussion. The presiding official added, "We will have it filed with the PUC in a public manner and go from there." He also said a meeting with the PUC is expected to be set up by "our Senator Bridal Birdwell." The court noted a PUC hearing is expected in February, followed by public comment windows and a statutory decision period.

No formal vote: commissioners did not adopt a resolution on Dec. 8. The presiding official said staff will continue to refine the text and that a meaningful, non-generic resolution could be filed once engineering details and communications analyses are finalized. He said the county may hold a special hearing to approve a resolution if timing requires.

Next steps: the court said it will finalize engineer-supplied language, coordinate with communications staff and counsel, and file the resolution with the PUC. County officials said they will keep the public updated on any special meeting or filing date.

Provenance: Topic introduced at SEG 199; most recent related discussion ran through SEG 393.