Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee agrees to draft changes to vacancy-notification rules and to explore applicant-disclosure options

St. Croix County Administration Committee · December 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors debated adding municipal clerks to vacancy-notification lists and whether chairs must provide applicant lists for appointments; the committee approved drafting a resolution to add municipal clerks and directed staff to craft a balanced approach on applicant information consistent with state law.

Supervisor Counter introduced two related items: (1) amending county board rules to add municipal clerks to the notification list when a county supervisory vacancy arises, and (2) requiring the county board chair to provide the board with a list of applicants and information submitted for appointments.

On the first item, the committee agreed to move the amendment forward and corporation counsel said the change would be drafted as a resolution and returned at the next meeting. The committee voted to bring the amendment forward.

On the second item — requiring the chair to provide applicant information — supervisors voiced competing concerns. Supervisor Shirley said the board needs application materials to make an informed confirmation vote, asking for at least the list of who applied and a pathway to request more information. Supervisor Long warned against publicizing interview-stage information and said some interview content could be inappropriate to discuss in public. Corporation counsel pointed to state statutes governing appointments and public-record disclosure and cautioned that some information may need redaction. The counsel cited legal limits on release and noted the statute 19.367 concerning release of finalist identities; counsel also referenced Wisconsin statutes governing appointment authority (as cited in the meeting record).

Rather than adopt a rule immediately, the committee settled on a middle ground: staff will draft language that (a) adds municipal clerks to the notice list; (b) clarifies the application-disclosure process consistent with state law (including redaction rules and limits if more than five applicants); and (c) explores a process for supervisors to review candidate information (for example, distribution by email or one-on-one conversations with the chair before the meeting). Corporation counsel agreed to prepare a draft for review at the next meeting.

No binding change to appointment authority was made; further legal drafting and a formal vote are expected at the subsequent meeting.