Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Peoria County infrastructure briefing flags $240,000 shortfall on Kickapoo‑Edwards road bid
Summary
County presenters told the board a resurfacing/resilience bid for Kickapoo‑Edwards Road came in at about $1.34 million versus a $1.2 million budget, leaving roughly a $240,000 gap; staff said the developer has offered a contribution but water, sewer and contractual complexities remain.
During committee reports the county reviewed several infrastructure items and spent considerable time on the Kickapoo‑Edwards Road resurfacing and related development agreement. A county presenter summarized seven items from the infrastructure agenda and described the Kickapoo‑Edwards bid and financing options.
The presenter said the county had budgeted about $1.2 million for the project; the low bid from William Charles was "about 1,300,000.0" and later described as approximately $1.34 million, leaving an estimated shortfall of roughly $240,000. The presenter said the developer had borne the A&E costs and "point blank said, my company would be writing a check for a half $1,000,000," and that staff are exploring options to close the gap through projected sales‑tax revenue, general tax revenue and other local revenue streams.
The presenter also warned of site constraints that add cost: there is no water or sewer at the site and additional stormwater and lining work were included in the bid. He noted the site is in an enterprise zone with initial abatement years and that estimated property values and future tax revenues factor into financing discussions. The presenter said county staff will not sign the contract until an executed developer agreement is in place and that the board may consider different contractual approaches or a short‑term loan to bridge the shortfall.
Other infrastructure matters noted to the board included a Cedar Hills Drive retaining wall project (about $700,000) to address storm damage and Sheridan Road phase 2 preliminary engineering tied to a state grant. The presenter framed the Kickapoo‑Edwards discussion as a policy choice between absorbing additional cost to secure the economic development opportunity or letting the offer lapse.
No final contract award or board authorization to commit additional funds was recorded in the transcript; staff said further policy discussion and a return to the board are likely before any binding action.
