Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves two planned unit developments: mobile home dealership and industrial expansion with buffer

Citrus County Board of County Commissioners · January 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board unanimously approved a PUD for a mobile-home dealership on Candy Lane and an industrial expansion that moves the industrial boundary westward and locks in a permanent 150-foot green buffer between industrial and rural residential areas.

In the meeting’s public hearings, the commission approved two land-use items by unanimous vote.

Sam’s Mobile Home Service (PUD2025-00011): Applicant David Walker asked to re-establish a mobile-home dealership and service site at 8705 West Candy Lane. Staff and the Planning & Development Commission noted the property has a history of mobile‑home and automotive sales and recommended approval with conditions. Commissioners approved the PUD and directed the chair and clerk to execute the ordinance.

Industrial expansion and PUD (CPADashAA-PUD2025-00003): Engineer Michael Wilburn and staff described a request to redraw the rural-residential/industrial boundary roughly 300 feet to the west, align the industrial boundary with adjacent industrial land to the south, and place a PUD over the combined industrial acreage. The master plan shows multiple small warehouse/contractor units, two retention ponds, and a permanent 150-foot green buffer (a Type D landscape buffer without a wall) between the industrial area and adjacent rural residential parcels. Staff noted central water will be provided on-site (public consumption well) and that sewer will be handled with clustered aerobic systems that meet comprehensive plan criteria. The Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions; the board accepted the recommendation and directed the clerk to record the ordinance.

Both PUDs passed on 4-0 votes. Staff will proceed with permitting under the conditions set by the Planning & Development Commission and the board.