Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Tethering topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners seek deeper tethering data as Wayne County accepts WEB report
Summary
Commissioners accepted the Warrant Enforcement Bureau report comparing FY2023–24 and FY2024–25 activity but pressed juvenile services for more detailed data on tether violations, re-arrests and the role of limited residential placements.
Wayne County commissioners voted to receive a Warrant Enforcement Bureau (WEB) report comparing fiscal-year activity across 2023–24 and 2024–25, but several commissioners said the document lacks detail on outcomes and asked staff to provide fuller trend and violation data.
Commissioner Anderson moved to receive the WEB report and Commissioner Morecki supported the motion; the chair called the voice vote and the motion carried. The report described WEB operations and a vendor relationship for tether monitoring, but commissioners repeatedly asked for data beyond simple counts.
Commissioner Killeen criticized the report’s level of detail, saying, “I guess I was expecting a little something different, from the title of this report than what I was actually reading.” He asked for numbers showing how many tethered youth violated their tether, how many were rearrested or returned to custody, and whether increases reflect more youths kept at home instead of being placed in residential facilities. Deputy Director Tia Loran and Captain Muscarello told commissioners that a contractor called 'house arrest services' installs and monitors tether devices and that deputies now perform more compliance checks, which staff said has contributed to an increase in monitored youth and more detected violations. Captain Muscarello said the county recorded 94 detentions tied to this activity this year and that the daily tether count is approximately 134.
Commissioner Meraki asked whether youths who would qualify for secure beds but cannot be placed because of limited capacity are being put on tethers; staff said judges may order tethering pending placement and that court orders indicate the purpose of the tether. Commissioners asked staff to produce multi-year trend data (three to five years if possible) and to provide a breakdown showing how many of the detained youths were returned to custody versus allowed to remain on tethered supervision.
Commissioners also asked for counts of tethered youths with mental-health needs and whether mental-health courts or other diversion options are being used where appropriate. Staff agreed to provide the requested additional summary data and trend analysis to support oversight.
The meeting proceeded to subsequent agenda items after the WEB discussion; the report was received by voice vote.
