Lawmakers and industry urge uniform rules, sandboxes and clarity for fintech scaling
Loading...
Summary
Members pressed witnesses on the costs of 50‑state licensing, the promise of regulatory sandboxes, and questions about fintech access to Federal Reserve payment rails; witnesses urged uniformity, predictable rules, and appropriate AML/KYC safeguards.
Members of the House Financial Services Subcommittee used the hearing to probe structural barriers that can impede fintech startups from scaling, and to weigh policy responses such as regulatory sandboxes and clarified access to central bank services.
Jody Kelly of the Electronic Transactions Association and other witnesses described the current state licensing environment as a costly patchwork for startups. Kelly told the committee that complying with numerous state transmitter licensing regimes can cost millions and take years — a burden that can stifle small companies. Representative Huizenga and other members asked for concrete proposals to reduce that friction.
Multiple witnesses supported targeted regulatory sandboxes as a tool to let firms and regulators test new products under supervision. Panelists said sandboxes can reveal unintended discrimination, enable real‑time fixes, and produce empirical evidence to guide durable rules rather than retrofitting legacy frameworks.
Lawmakers also asked about possible fintech access to Federal Reserve services (FedNow/Fedwire) and proposals for “skinny” master or payment accounts. Industry witnesses said broader access could increase innovation and inclusion but urged safeguards — including anti‑money‑laundering/KYC standards, operational resilience, and safety‑and‑soundness considerations — and stressed that regulators and supervisors must retain appropriate tools to prevent abuse.
Members did not reach consensus on precise statutory changes but discussed paths forward: (1) clearer federal standards to avoid costly state-by‑state compliance; (2) pilot sandboxes with transparency and consumer safeguards; and (3) design requirements if fintechs gain access to Fed rails to ensure consistency with bank regulatory obligations.
The committee requested written follow‑up from witnesses; hearing record holds multiple technical questions that lawmakers flagged for further development.
