Get email alerts on the High Desert Ranch topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Redmond planning commission continues High Desert Ranch hearing to Oct. 8
Summary
The Redmond Urban Area Planning Commission agreed Oct. 1 to continue the public hearing on the High Desert Ranch annexation/PUD/subdivision/conditional‑use applications to Wednesday, Oct. 8 at 5:30 p.m., after the applicant requested more time to provide additional evidence responsive to the staff report.
Get email alerts on the High Desert Ranch topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Redmond Urban Area Planning Commission on Oct. 1 voted to continue the public hearing on the High Desert Ranch land‑use applications to Wednesday, Oct. 8 at 5:30 p.m.
Joey Shearer, a planner with AKS Engineering representing applicant Lennar, asked the commission to delay the hearing while the applicant assembles additional evidence responding to requests in the staff report. “We are actively working on additional evidence and arguments to address requests for additional information presented in the staff report,” Shearer said, and proposed the Oct. 8, 5:30 p.m. date.
A commissioner moved to continue the hearing to that date and another seconded the motion. The commission voted in favor and the chair announced the motion carried, scheduling the continued hearing for Oct. 8 at 5:30 p.m.
The applications on the record include annexation, planned unit development, tentative subdivision and conditional use for the property identified in the hearing notice (listed by staff with case numbers and the site at 3220 Northwest Way in Redmond). Staff will incorporate any additional material submitted into the project record ahead of the rescheduled hearing and members of the public who wish to testify should re‑sign in per the posted procedures.
The next procedural step is the continued public hearing on Oct. 8; the commission will take testimony and consider the record at that meeting.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
