Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates RM‑11 spacing and open‑space standards, agrees to refine proposal
Summary
The commission debated proposed amendments to RM‑11 (minimum distances between units and open‑space percentages). Commissioners discussed 20–30% open‑space figures, minimum spacing scaling with lot size, and urged design standards to favor family‑friendly layouts; the item was tabled pending revised language and council discussion in January.
During a lengthy Dec. 3 discussion the Richfield Planning Commission revisited a proposed amendment to RM‑11 that would change minimum distance requirements between multi‑family units and clarify open‑space percentages required per development.
Commissioners criticized dense layouts on oddly‑shaped lots and emphasized the need for usable open space and family‑friendly design. Several commissioners proposed a compromise open‑space target of about 25 percent (others cited 20% or 30% as reference points), and they discussed how minimum spacing should scale with lot acreage (examples included calculations tied to per‑acre unit yields). One commissioner said, “Just because you can, doesn't mean you should,” arguing for fewer units and better internal amenity space.
Commissioners also suggested adding design intent language — for example, requiring 'family‑friendly' intentional layout choices such as front/back yards or small play areas — rather than allowing purely stacked units with minimal outdoor space. Because the new City Council will be seated in January, staff proposed returning with revised language for public hearing and council consideration; the commission voted to table the amendment until revisions are made.
Next steps: staff to draft revised RM‑11 language (including open‑space percentage and spacing rules) and present it for public hearing and council review in January.
