Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners refuse to transmit developer‑backed conservation‑subdivision amendment, citing policy gaps
Summary
After extensive public comment, the board voted unanimously not to transmit a privately initiated comprehensive‑plan amendment (CPA 2024‑B) that would have broadened where rural lands could qualify for conservation‑subdivision density incentives, and asked staff to pursue clearer, county‑initiated policy changes first.
The Sarasota County Board unanimously voted not to transmit CPA 2024‑B to the Florida Department of Commerce. The privately initiated amendment sought to add locational criteria to allow certain rural heritage estate parcels — notably a Tatum Ridge golf‑course parcel and a few adjacent properties — to qualify for conservation‑subdivision density incentives (up to 2 units per acre) tied to transfer‑of‑development‑rights (TDR) credits.
Petitioners argued the change would enable master‑planned redevelopment of underused or 'stranded' assets, preserve at least 50% permanent open space, and create better connectivity with adjacent village open space and economic‑development RMAs. Staff noted the proposed criteria would initially apply to a small set of parcels, but also warned that existing conservation subdivisions have often met open‑space minimums with storm‑water basins and fields rather than external habitat connectivity the policy intends.
More than 60 public speakers — ranchers, equestrians, local conservation groups, Realtors and residents wearing yellow shirts in organized opposition — urged the board to reject the amendment, calling current conservation‑subdivision practice a 'loophole' that has produced developments indistinguishable from conventional subdivisions and has, in some cases, worsened flooding or fragmented habitat.
Multiple commissioners said they were sympathetic to infill and conservation goals but agreed staff’s recommendation to first craft county‑initiated policy changes to tighten open‑space and connectivity standards before expanding where density incentives may apply. Commissioners asked staff to return with more detailed, county‑led amendments and clarified standards, including open‑space quality, limits on counting stormwater basins, and stronger floodplain and dark‑sky protections.
The board directed staff to pursue policy work rather than advance the applicant’s transmittal.
