Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident criticizes commissioners over 'dysfunction'; board responds
Summary
Duane Wheatley urged greater professionalism and transparency, criticized spending on satellite trash sites and a dormant TIF parcel, and said commissioners and council are not working together; commissioners responded with explanations about inherited decisions, redevelopment plans and meeting practices.
During the Jan. 21 public comment period, Duane Wheatley said he had lived in Scott County two years and called for commissioners and council members to "leave your egos at the door" and act professionally. He criticized past spending, including satellite trash sites and renovations, questioned the use of a nine-year dormant TIF district, and asked why public speakers were placed at the end of agendas.
Commissioners and staff responded at length. They said the agenda placement of public comment is set administratively and has varied over time; that many past purchases and decisions were inherited from prior administrations; and that the county recently transferred an unused parcel to redevelopment to allow the redevelopment commission to pursue projects. Commissioners acknowledged public frustration, defended some steps taken to improve county finances and recruitment for redevelopment, and said they are working to increase transparency and professionalize board composition.
The exchange included discussion of a public defender board schedule versus state requirements (a county board official reported noncompliance in parts of 2023/2024 and later remediation), and commissioners urged residents to verify facts rather than rely on social-media posts. The meeting record shows some tension and repeated appeals for improved cooperation and transparency.
