Commissioners question copier contract billing and multi‑year lease obligations
Commissioners debated whether to pay an invoice reflecting an older, higher monthly rate after contract renegotiation, citing an AG opinion that multi‑year leases can create unconstitutional debt; court agreed to hold payment pending invoice clarification.
The full story
Commissioners reviewed a copier contract and a disputed invoice. The court recorded discussion that the paperwork shows a monthly rate of $194.40 while an invoice reflected a prior higher amount ($303.80). Several members questioned paying for months when equipment was not in use and raised concerns about multi‑year lease obligations.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in