Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit of draft article vs. transcript
Summary
Checklist audit identifying transcription ambiguities and attribution limitations that affected the draft article.
Spelling: []
Clarity: []
Chronology: []
Framing: []
Misinformation: []
Misidentification: [{"type":"missing_speaker_names","description":"Transcript does not provide speaker names; article uses 'Speaker 1' and 'Speaker 2' as unidentified participants and flags this limitation.","severity":"medium"}]
Out_of_context: []
Quantitative precision: [{"type":"unclear_vote_tallies","description":"Transcript contains fragmented numerical counts and name calls during the room-location vote; exact tallies cannot be reliably determined from the text.","severity":"high"}]
Process clarity: []
Context clarity: [{"type":"unspecified_state_law","description":"Speaker 2 referenced a 'state law' requiring more specific agendas but did not identify the statute; article notes the law as not specified.","severity":"low"}]
Question emphasis: []
Omission: []
Bias: []
Duplicate: []
Attribution Lock: [{"type":"attribution_limit","description":"Because mover/second names and clear vote counts are not present in the transcript, those details are labeled 'not specified' rather than attributed to named individuals.","severity":"medium"}]
