Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit of draft article vs transcript
Summary
Checklist of identified issues in the draft article and transcript that required correction or clarification before finalizing the article.
Spelling: [{"type":"spelling","description":"Inconsistent name spellings in the transcript (examples: 'Coley' vs 'Cooley'; 'Panara' appears in multiple variant forms such as 'Panamariff', 'Panamoreff', 'Panamoref'). The transcript uses variant forms across segments.","severity":"medium"}]
Clarity: [{"type":"clarity","description":"Some numeric utterances in the transcript are unclear (e.g., '$1.07?' and '$1.75' comments) and appear out of context; the article should not present a dollar figure without transcript confirmation.","severity":"medium"}]
Chronology: []
Framing: []
Misinformation: [{"type":"misinformation","description":"Transcript references 'public meetings law' without statutory citation; described as 'public meetings law' rather than citing a specific statute. Article correctly paraphrases but flags the reference as policy/law rather than inventing a statute name.","severity":"low"}]
Misidentification: [{"type":"misidentification","description":"Several roll call and discussion attributions use slightly different name spellings for the same person; this risks attributing a quote to the wrong individual. The article standardized usage to the first attributable form in the record (e.g., 'Member Coley') and flagged the transcript inconsistencies for transparency.","severity":"medium"}]
Out_of_context: []
Quantitative precision: [{"type":"quantitative_precision","description":"The transcript contains point totals for rubric categories and suggested point shifts; ensure the article reports those point numbers exactly as spoken and marks any inferred totals or arithmetic as 'intended' or 'checked by staff' rather than definitive if ambiguity exists.","severity":"medium"}]
Process clarity: [{"type":"process_clarity","description":"The legal effect of making a subcommittee 'advisory to staff' vs 'recommending to the board' was raised; staff said open‑meetings law may apply depending on who the recommendation is made to. The article must preserve that distinction and not conflate advisory vs recommending bodies.","severity":"high"}]
Context clarity: [{"type":"context_clarity","description":"The RFQ packet contains attachments (e.g., "Leland attachment") referenced by staff; the article should cite them as packet attachments rather than assume city code or ordinance names.","severity":"low"}]
Question emphasis: []
Omission: [{"type":"omission","description":"The draft should include both formal votes (consent calendar and RFQ motion); the first draft included these, but it also should note that Vice Chair Anna Byers was absent, and that appointments were deferred because a member was missing.","severity":"medium"}]
Bias: []
Duplicate: []
Transcript Segment Error: [{"type":"transcript_segment_error","description":"The transcript contains multiple inconsistent spellings of the same members; the timeline and article referenced the first clear appearance for provenance but flagged later variations.","severity":"medium"}]
