Grantees raise confidentiality and workload concerns as MLSC implements row‑level reporting
Audience members and MLSC presenters spent a large portion of the session on grantee burdens and confidentiality: MLSC will not accept PII and plans regional anonymization for small counties, but attendees warned about re‑identification from secondary data fields and the political risks of city data-sharing.
The full story
During a Jan. 28 session on MLSC’s shift to row‑level reporting, grantees pressed presenters on two recurring issues: the workload of producing row‑level exports and the risk that supposedly non‑identifying fields could re‑identify clients.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or