Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nursing Intervention Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board committee clarifies flexibility for "mental-health-only" participants in nursing intervention program
Summary
The California Board of Registered Nursing's IEC 3 received guidance allowing flexibility for nurses identified as "mental-health-only" participants: drug testing and full clinical diagnostic evaluations are not required, return-to-work timelines may be shortened with monitoring, and worksite-monitor supervision levels can be tailored to public-safety risk.
Loretta Melby, executive officer for the California Board of Registered Nursing's intervention program, told members of the Intervention Evaluation Committee (IEC 3) on Jan. 14 that staff reviewed statutes, regulations and the Department of Consumer Affairs'uniform standards and concluded those standards were written primarily for substance-use-disorder cases and need not automatically bind participants who are mental-health-only.
"If you have a participant that is mental health only, not dual diagnosis ... you can go outside of those uniform standard guidelines," Melby said during an education update. She said the IEC can tailor requirements, including whether to require drug testing, the length of program enrollment, and return-to-work conditions, provided the committee documents its rationale and safeguards for public safety.
The clarification means IECs are not required to impose routine drug screening for mental-health-only participants; Melby said committees may request one or two baseline tests if they believe it is warranted but must record the rationale. She also said a full clinical diagnostic evaluation is not mandatory when an established therapist or psychiatrist provides documentation sufficient to determine a participant's readiness to return to practice.
Melby described the program's worksite-monitor options and supervision tiers'minimum, moderate and maximum'which can support earlier, supervised return-to-work when appropriate. "Those are things that ... the participant can get back to work and we can continue to protect the public while they're in this program," she said.
Laura Thomas, a nurse member of IEC 3, welcomed the guidance, saying it may encourage nurses with mental-health issues to seek help through the program. "I am thrilled to hear that you really looked at the Nurse Practice Act and uniform standards," Thomas said, adding she could think of several potential participants who might meet the clarified criteria.
Staff also told the committee the board is working with Premier Health Group on IEC education and outreach; 71 outreach materials were emailed in the most recent quarter. Melby asked members to continue submitting questions and suggested changes by email as staff plans to roll the education out to other IEC panels.
The guidance does not eliminate the committee's authority to require more restrictive measures when public-safety concerns are documented. Melby said if members have evidence the participant poses a public risk, they may recommend license inactivation or other measures and staff will review recommendations through the board's processes, including referral to GESPRI when appropriate.
The board emphasized that protecting the public remains the program's primary responsibility while permitting individualized recommendations that may shorten time out of practice for some mental-health-only participants.
