Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Act topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bill to clarify emergency meeting authority for counties draws support from Skagit and counties' association, critics want tighter definitions

State Government & Tribal Relations Committee · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Lekanoff said HB 2520 clarifies that county governing bodies may meet remotely or outside the county seat to take expedited action during emergencies; Skagit County and the Washington State Association of Counties supported clarifying authority while open-government advocates asked for a strict statutory definition of 'emergency.'

Representative Deborah Lekanoff introduced House Bill 2520 as a clarification to the Open Public Meetings Act after recent flooding in Skagit County forced county leaders to meet outside normal locations. "This bill offers that simple clarification to the open public meeting site, authorizing counties to hold special meetings outside of the county seat or remotely when necessary to take expedited action needed to meet an emergency," Lekanoff said.

Skagit County representatives and the Washington State Association of Counties supported the bill in testimony, saying it pulls together disparate statutory citations and clarifies authority that county officials already exercise in exigent circumstances. Josh Weese (Skagit County) said the bill is "not an expansion, just a clarification" and recounted officials needing to coordinate emergency repairs and interaction with the governor and Army Corps of Engineers. Paul Jewell (Association of Counties) described the bill as "belt and suspenders" language to reduce on-the-ground confusion.

Open-government groups and a legal practitioner urged tightening the definition of "emergency" and adding guardrails; they cautioned that without a clear statutory trigger the exemption could be misused to limit public access to final actions. Staff confirmed that minutes remain required even for emergency meetings, though advance notice may not be required in some emergency circumstances under the bill.