Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
California lawmakers hold informational hearing on AI training, copyright and transparency
Summary
Joint Senate and Assembly informational hearing gathered academics, industry and creatives to assess training-data transparency, enforcement limits under federal copyright, and technical tools vendors say can detect reused content; creators pressed for AB 412 and clearer disclosure mechanisms.
Sacramento — Lawmakers from the California State Senate Judiciary Committee and the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee convened an informational hearing at Stanford to gather evidence on how generative artificial intelligence is trained and whether creators should be entitled to notice, credit or compensation.
The hearing’s chairs, Senator Umberg and Assemblymember Bauer Kahan, framed the session as a fact-finding exercise rather than a vote on legislation. “This is truly an informational hearing,” Senator Umberg said, and members repeatedly asked witnesses how state policy could protect California’s large creative economy while preserving innovation in AI.
Academic witnesses described a mixed legal landscape. Professor Pam Samuelson (University of California, Berkeley) told the committees that about 65 lawsuits have been filed alleging copyright claims tied to AI training and that courts are split on whether some uses constitute fair use. “Fair use can enable copyright to adapt at a time of rapid technological change,”…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
