Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Fire Station 3 feasibility review finds existing building cannot support modern replacement on-site; city acquired adjacent parcel for relocation

Fairfax City Council · April 22, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff and BKB architects told council the existing Fire Station 3 structure cannot be salvaged or expanded to meet modern operational and cancer‑risk reduction standards. Test-fits and site evaluation led to acquisition of an adjacent George Mason Foundation parcel; concept designs and program validation are underway with preliminary design completion targeted in June.

The city’s fire department and the architect team presented a feasibility update for Fire Station 3 during the April 22 work session, concluding the existing multistory building is not suitable for a state‑of‑the‑art replacement on the same narrow parcel.

What the consultants said: BKB Architect Group reported a functional assessment of the existing Station 3 building that found structural and program limitations that preclude cost-effective renovation or expansion. Test fits on the existing site showed narrow dimensions and operational constraints that would require temporary relocation and higher costs. As a result, the project team evaluated alternate sites and scored candidates using GIS and response‑time modeling; the city subsequently acquired the adjacent George Mason Foundation parcel to enable a replacement facility closer to the station’s service area.

Program and schedule: The replacement program anticipates a five-bay drive-through apparatus bay, gear decontamination spaces, individual bunkrooms for fatigue reduction, and modern support and workspaces. Staff described a design schedule that will move to preliminary concept designs, updated cost estimates and community review, with design milestones through June and further design development planned thereafter.

Costs and next steps: The CIP line shown in earlier materials reflected a rough estimate based on comparable station costs; staff said preliminary cost figures will be refined when concept designs are complete. Council asked about ALTA surveys, appropriation timing, and how debt would be issued; finance staff explained capital planning and level‑funding approaches for multi-year projects and the need to formally appropriate funds before bid and award.

Provenance: the station presentation and Q&A were delivered during the work session between council and fire department staff and architects.