Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Poquoson EDA reviews proposed comp-plan language for north side of Victory Boulevard
Summary
At its February meeting the Poquoson Economic Development Authority discussed planning commission and city council consideration of future-land-use language that could show adjacent research-and-development parcels as general commercial; board members stressed a comp‑plan change is not an immediate rezoning and noted tradeoffs between green space and tax revenue.
At the February meeting of the Poquoson Economic Development Authority, staff briefed board members on a planning commission and city council discussion about changes to the city’s comprehensive plan for the north side of Victory Boulevard. The briefing focused on proposed future-land-use language that would show some adjacent research-and-development parcels as general commercial, a change staff said would be reflected in the future land-use map rather than an immediate rezoning.
Unidentified Speaker 5, a staff member addressing the board, said, "The discussion led to a little bit of language change into our comprehensive plan," and emphasized that showing property as general commercial on the future land-use map does not itself rezone the land. "That doesn't mean they're doing a rezoning currently for the property," the staff member said, noting any rezoning would come later after additional outreach to property owners.
Board members discussed how the EDA's holdings fit into broader planning goals. "We own six parcels," said Unidentified Speaker 3, identifying the number of EDA-owned lots under discussion. Members weighed keeping parcels as green space or parks against the potential tax revenue from commercial development. One board member summarized the trade-off in practical terms: parkland and sidewalks cost money to build and maintain, and commercial development can generate tax revenue to fund those amenities.
The staff presentation and ensuing discussion also touched on fiscal constraints facing the city. Unidentified Speaker 5 described budgetary pressure related to exemptions under the disabled-veterans tax program and stated an approximate revenue impact figure: "it's right now at 1,600,000" (as presented to the board). That figure was offered as staff context for constrained local revenues; the meeting did not include independent verification of the amount.
Board members were clear that the comp-plan language change is an early, nonbinding planning step. Staff said city council could provide direction to the planning commission at an upcoming council meeting, and any formal rezoning would require separate procedures and property-owner engagement.
The board did not take formal action on land-use changes at the meeting. Next steps described by staff include continued coordination between council and the planning commission and outreach to affected property owners before any rezoning is proposed.
