Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

At a glance: Covington County Commission votes — Jan. 15, 2026

Covington County Commission · January 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Summary of actions taken by the Covington County Commission Jan. 15: consent agenda approved; jail mat service contract authorized; courthouse roof repair approved ($24,655.46); lime‑rock bid awarded; and other routine matters handled.

The Covington County Commission took the following actions on Jan. 15, 2026.

- Consent agenda approved: minutes for 11/19/2025, 12/15/2025, 12/16/2025 and accounts payable/payroll for December 2025 (packet pages 2–28). Motion made by Tommy; second by Ben; carried by voice vote.

- Jail mat service contract: Commission authorized entering a contract for mat service with Santos (continuing mat service but not renewing work‑release uniforms). Presenter said mat service was about $40–$50 per week to the jail budget. Motion carried by voice vote.

- Courthouse roof/ceiling repairs: Commissioners approved an estimate to seal deteriorated brickwork and apply a silicone roof coating to stop leaks above upstairs offices; total estimated cost $24,655.46. Motion carried by voice vote; classified as capital improvement.

- Lime/rock contract award: Staff reported one bid received (Sarah Pate Logging / Brooklyn Limestone as backup) to supply line materials; commission approved award to provide alternate supply when local plants are unavailable.

- Other routine items: Announcements of board vacancies and appointments (South Alabama Planning & Development and OCAP), mobile dumpster schedule and ongoing roadwork updates were presented; the commission recessed to conduct EMA Group A interviews after the meeting.

Votes were recorded as voice votes in the meeting; the transcript does not include a roll‑call tally for individual commissioners.