Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensure Verification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee urges outreach to planning agencies after finding a loophole that allows unlicensed designs to reach planning review
Summary
Staff told the committee planning departments often do not verify licensure before approving nonexempt projects, creating a loophole that can allow unlicensed designers to obtain planning approvals; the committee recommended targeted outreach to planning organizations (California APA), city managers and county attorneys before pursuing regulation changes.
Staff presented Strategic Objective F2, asking whether regulatory or statutory clarification could require planning departments to verify licensure for projects that are not exempt from the practice of architecture. The committee heard that while building departments typically verify licensure before issuing a permit, planning departments often do not and that practice has allowed nonexempt designs to advance through planning review.
Mike (staff) explained the legal background: the practice of architecture and licensure requirements are set out in the Business and Professions Code and related regulations; enforcement staff said an interpretive gap in how planning departments apply the verification requirement has produced a practical loophole. The board discussed inserting the word “planning” into the statutory language as an illustrative fix but recognized that outreach and voluntary compliance by planning agencies would be less intrusive than immediate statutory change.
Committee members suggested multiple, staged approaches: (1) a targeted mailing and education campaign to planning departments and the California chapter of the American Planning Association (APA); (2) outreach to community development directors and city/county attorneys to encourage coordinated planning–building practices; and (3) only later pursuing regulatory or statutory amendment if voluntary efforts fail. The committee asked staff to pilot outreach and report back; no regulatory action was initiated at this meeting.
