Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teton County panel considers restructuring administrator role, seeks internal candidates first
Summary
Commissioners discussed a proposed reorganization to create/clarify a county administrator role, including moving public works oversight into that position and advertising internally for the post for one week before going public.
The Teton County Board of County Commissioners used the second portion of its Jan. 14 special meeting to discuss reorganizing county administration and filling the county administrator role.
Speaker 3 presented a memorandum, a draft job description and a proposed resolution outlining expanded responsibilities for a county administrator, including authority to hire staff for non-department-head positions and to streamline administrative processes. The proposal would not give the administrator authority over department heads or volunteer boards; those functions would remain with the board.
During the discussion the board considered several options: advertise the position internally for a week and move quickly on internal candidates; appoint an interim from within while conducting a broader search; or advertise publicly if no internal candidate emerges. Speaker 3 recommended internal circulation first: "give staff a week to reply" and then act quickly depending on applicants.
Several speakers raised concerns about concentrating too many duties in one job. Commissioners discussed the difficulty of finding a single candidate with both deep engineering and broad administrative experience and debated whether to move the public works director into the administrator role. Speaker 3 proposed shifting some engineering work to contractors, using an assistant to support the administrator, and reallocating salary savings toward staffing and transition costs.
Daryl (first referenced by name in the transcript) said he had not considered being a candidate for such a role and expressed reservations about giving up technical engineering responsibilities. Commissioners acknowledged the need to preserve institutional knowledge and discussed staged transitions (six months to a year) and ensuring adequate support so that a move would not cause operational disruption.
Speaker 3 said he planned to post the job internally for a week and, if no suitable internal candidate applied, to open the vacancy to the public. The board discussed follow-up steps including vetting, potential interim coverage, and whether any portion of the discussion about a named employee's performance should be handled in executive session. The meeting record shows no final decision to adopt the structural change during this session.
