Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sidewalk Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mount Pleasant advances draft sidewalk program to map, inspect and prioritize repairs
Summary
City staff presented a draft sidewalk policy to inventory 9.3 miles of sidewalks, inspect them within six months and prioritize repairs by safety, ADA compliance and usage; council asked for clearer responsibilities, a map and a demonstration of the online inspection tool before final adoption.
Mount Pleasant city staff presented a draft sidewalk policy that would create a citywide inspection and repair program covering roughly 9.3 miles of public sidewalks. The presenter said the policy is intended to identify priority repairs and reduce liability, arguing, "it's not a matter of if we get sued for bad sidewalks, it's when we get sued." The program would require an initial inspection within six months of policy adoption and annual follow-ups, using an online GIS-based form (Sunrise) or paper records.
Under the draft, the city would identify sidewalk segments requiring immediate attention based on safety hazards and ADA compliance, then compile estimated costs showing city vs. adjacent-owner responsibility. The presenter described defect types (lift/uneven, missing panels, tree-root damage, drainage issues) and explained the plan to present a ranked repair schedule for council approval so the council can decide which repairs to fund each year.
Council members pressed staff to clarify which sidewalks are the city's responsibility versus adjacent private owners or state-owned frontage. One member read the city code on snow removal timing (code section 7.020.150), and multiple members asked for a public map showing the segments the city would maintain. Councillors also debated marking methods: some favored online flags and fewer street markings to avoid a proliferation of yellow paint; others said physical markings demonstrate the city’s intent to fix hazards and are valuable to insurers.
Council discussed options to manage costs, including contracting specialized concrete coring firms that previously bid to grind and level sidewalks (council cited prior bids around $11,000 for a corridor project) and purchasing or renting grinders for smaller lifts. Staff said the trust that may provide funding wants a demonstrable plan and timeline — the city needs an approved policy and visible work plan by May–June to align with trust expectations. The Sunrise GIS layer and form would allow inspectors to pin problem locations, upload photos and export estimated repair costs.
The council did not adopt the policy tonight. Staff will reword unclear sections (ownership language, exhibit consolidation), provide a map of city-maintained sidewalk segments, arrange a Sunrise demonstration, and return a revised policy, repair schedule and recommended fee/enforcement approach for future action.
