Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council authorizes outreach on West Harrisville Road right-of-way after consultants press 99-foot claim
Summary
Consultants told the council that historic deeds and county plats support a 99-foot county right-of-way on West Harrisville Road; council approved statements that let acquisition staff begin formal offers for temporary construction easements while residents and council question whether federal law and later surveys change that boundary.
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants and city staff briefed Harrisville City Council on the West Harrisville Road project and the city'9s proposed approach to property compensation, and the council voted to authorize the acquisition team to begin formal offers to affected property owners.
Cody Peterson, project manager for ASI Engineering, opened the work session with a chronology of record evidence, saying the road was deeded in 1885 as a 6-rod (99-foot) county road and that county plats from 1972 through 1996 show a 49.5-foot half-width on both sides. "Everything that I've seen ... shows that, historically, all the lines line up with the 99-foot," Peterson said, and he added that UDOT Region 1 and the UDOT complex'9s right-of-way staff concur with his interpretation.
The presentation identified a small number of parcels that deviate from the 99-foot description because later private surveys or boundary agreements recorded new descriptions. Peterson said the design team intends to rely on the 99-foot historical line when it comes to compensation and easements, but acknowledged a set of outlier parcels will require closer deed research.
Residents and council members raised a competing legal question: several commenters and one resident noted or pointed staff toward the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and suggested that where an historic road was not permanently maintained or recorded as used, the effective public easement could be limited to what was actually occupied (often 80 feet on recent projects). Marvin Farrell told the council he had checked the Weber County surveyor'9s files and believed the 1885 lines had not been filed in a way that preserved the full 99-foot claim. Peterson said he had not found documentary evidence that the county had relinquished a portion of the right-of-way and offered to investigate further.
On the design side, staff described cross-section choices the project team considered: earlier master plans and funding applications showed pavement widths of 60 feet; later iterations dropped to 52 feet and then 50 feet of pavement to reduce impacts to residences. City design staff said the current proposal calls for roughly 50 feet of asphalt (three lanes including a two-way left turn lane), 6 to 7-foot sidewalks set at the back of curb, and 6-foot bike lanes. The design rationale included projected capacity and safety benefits: staff cited a most-recent count near 8,500 vehicles per day and a state projection of up to 13,000 by 2050; adding a center two-way left-turn lane was described as increasing capacity and improving turning safety.
Council action: The council voted to approve right-of-way compensation statements that allow the city'9s acquisition team to make monetary offers to property owners for temporary construction easements and removals of landscaping, fences and trees. Staff emphasized that approval does not finalize purchases; if an affected parcel triggers the federal threshold for a full appraisal (currently about $15,000 of impact), the city will return to council for purchase authorization. Several council members also asked staff to pursue clarifying documentation about the 1976 federal act and to continue outreach with the Weber County Surveyor to reconcile conflicting records.
What happens next: With statements approved, acquisition staff may open negotiations and provide formal offers to property owners. Staff said they will try to salvage improvements when possible and, where property owners seek to reinstall landscaping in non-needed portions of the historic 99-foot strip, the city will require a signed acknowledgment that the right-of-way remains on record. Additional legal or survey disputes may require further appraisal work and could return to council for final decisions.
Ending: Council members asked staff to continue fact-finding on the historical records and federal statute questions while beginning acquisition discussions. The council approved the statements and directed staff to return with clarifications or any parcels that require full appraisals.

