Experts at NIST panel urge transparency and caution in using likelihood ratios for forensic testimony
NIST-affiliated statisticians and an Innocence Project attorney debated whether likelihood ratios should be used in court, stressing model uncertainty, the need for robust data and disclosure, and warning that courts may exclude or undermine such evidence without transparency.
The full story
At a forensic-science panel, statisticians affiliated with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and Chris Fabricant of the Innocence Project outlined competing technical and legal challenges to using likelihood ratios to express the weight of forensic evidence.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in