Board launches review of a‑through‑g graduation requirements after wide concerns about implementation

Santa Rosa City Schools Board of Education · February 12, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees agreed Feb. 11 to begin a district‑wide review of A‑through‑G graduation requirements and implementation after public comment and trustee concerns about inequitable access, scheduling impacts and high waiver rates in math and world language.

The Santa Rosa City Schools board directed staff on Feb. 11 to initiate a thorough review of the district’s A‑through‑G graduation requirements and how those requirements are being implemented across sites.

The item was introduced by a trustee who said the goal is to ensure local decisions match classroom capacity and that teachers and site leaders are involved before any requirement changes are proposed. Public commenters and trustees raised several concerns: that a‑through‑g as implemented can be inflexible for students pursuing career and technical education paths, that high numbers of waivers for math and language courses signal implementation problems, and that some students are being tracked away from college pathways because of scheduling and advising practices.

Trustees discussed keeping the A‑through‑G expectation as a district goal while acknowledging multiple pathways to graduation and the need to strengthen early academic preparation—particularly in elementary grades—and supports for students who are behind. Trustee Medina expressed strong support for maintaining A‑through‑G access while improving supports and implementation; other trustees emphasized that the review must include special‑education, multilingual learner and site staff perspectives.

Staff said they would pull data on waivers and timing of identification (for example, language waivers often reflect students who already speak another language), provide clarity on definitions (what counts as a concentrator for CTE pathways) and return with a plan for site‑based engagement. The board signaled unanimous support for initiating the process; no changes to graduation policy were adopted that night.