Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.
Court accepts plea in theft case and revokes supervision in separate matters; Linda Flores revoked and sentenced
Loading...
Summary
The court accepted a no‑contest plea and imposed a state‑jail sentence in a theft case involving Angie Ford, later adjudicated and sentenced on a separate deferred adjudication matter; the court also found Linda Flores in violation and sentenced her to four years in prison after rejecting treatment continuation.
SAN ANTONIO — During a crowded morning calendar in the 187th District Court, Judge Stephanie Boyd accepted a plea and imposed sentences in two separate matters and adjudicated violations in another.
Angie Ford appeared on two separate cause numbers. In the theft case the court accepted Ford’s no‑contest plea (the court found the stipulated testimony and exhibits sufficient), and the court followed the parties’ agreement by sentencing her to two years in a state jail facility, imposing the agreed monetary penalty and ordering the sentence to run concurrently with a related matter. The court also entered no‑contact recommendations from the state as part of the disposition.
The court then proceeded on a separate deferred‑adjudication matter involving Ford. After the state alleged a violation and Ford pleaded true to the allegation, Judge Boyd found the violation true, revoked the deferred adjudication and sentenced Ford to two years in prison with credit for time served. The judge discussed transitional and therapeutic placement options with the defendant for post‑release support.
Separately, in State v. Linda Flores the court accepted Flores’ plea of true to violations arising from her deferred adjudication. Defense counsel asked for continued treatment placement and DDRF; the state sought revocation. Judge Boyd found the violations true, revoked community supervision, and sentenced Flores to four years in prison. The court noted the defendant’s caretaking history and circumstances raised by defense but concluded the record supported revocation and incarceration, while expressing willingness to assist with transitional placement on release.
All actions were taken on the record; counsel confirmed discovery, admonishments and waiver paperwork as required by the court.

