Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elected Officials Residency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to require officials to remain residents during term, creating vacancy if they move
Summary
HB 27-33 would require most elected officials to remain residents of the jurisdiction they represent for the duration of the term; if they cease to be qualified electors they would be ousted and a vacancy created. The committee moved the bill favorably under emergency final action and placed it on the consent agenda.
House Bill 27-33, discussed Feb. 11 before the Committee on Local Government, would amend multiple statutes to require elected officials to remain residents of the territory they represent throughout their term. The bill covers statewide offices (governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, secretary of state, state treasurer, commissioner of insurance), state board of education members, district attorneys (for specified counties), school board members, community college trustees and township officers.
Mister Revisor said the change would create uniform statutory language: if an official "ceases to be a qualified elector or a resident of that jurisdiction or territory, then they are immediately ousted from office, and a vacancy is created." The proposed provisions would take effect on July 1 if enacted.
Clay Barker, general counsel for the Kansas Secretary of State's Office, said the bill stems from a 2025 case in Gardner-Edgerton where a successful candidate moved out of the district after filing and before taking office; the episode created confusion and a vacancy. "We went through all the election residency statutes ... and focusing primarily on the local government level," Barker said, describing the bill as an effort to standardize inconsistent residency language across statutes.
Committee members raised practical questions about verification and enforcement. Revisor and Barker said residency determinations are ultimately complaint-driven: an objections board reviews evidence after a complaint is filed. Members also clarified that legislators are not included (residency for legislators is governed by the state constitution) and that county attorneys in some counties were intentionally excluded because they routinely serve multiple counties.
There was no neutral or opponent testimony recorded. The Vice Chair moved emergency final action and to report HB 27-33 favorably; the motion was seconded and the committee approved it. The committee also requested placing the bill on the House consent agenda.
Next steps: HB 27-33 will be sent to the House for further consideration, and questions about enforcement and individual cases would be addressed through objection procedures or subsequent hearings if contested.
