Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Firearms Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee adopts amendment, advances bill restricting certain 3‑D/CNC firearm manufacturing

Civil Rights and Judiciary Committee · February 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee adopted an amendment to House Bill 2,320 removing a rebuttable presumption about possession of digital firearm manufacturing code, then reported the proposed substitute out with an 8‑5 vote; sponsors said the substitute narrows scope to avoid capturing hobbyists and exempts law‑enforcement and military‑marketed machines.

The Civil Rights and Judiciary Committee adopted an amendment to House Bill 2,320 and then voted to report the proposed substitute out of committee with a "do pass" recommendation.

Matt Sterling, staff, summarized the bill as prohibiting manufacturing certain firearms and components using 3‑D printers or CNC milling machines, banning possession or distribution of digital firearm manufacturing code, and making some violations per se Consumer Protection Act violations. The proposed substitute, introduced by Rep. Salahuddin, would narrow coverage to devices "advertised, marketed, or promoted to consumers" with the primary function of manufacturing or assembling firearms and would exempt sales to law‑enforcement or military agencies. The substitute also authorized the attorney general to issue civil investigative demands where appropriate.

Representative Walsh moved amendment STIR 120 to remove a rebuttable presumption that mere possession of digital firearm manufacturing code establishes intent to unlawfully distribute or manufacture. Walsh and supporters said the change avoids shifting burdens of proof. The amendment was adopted by voice vote. Sponsors and backers emphasized stakeholder engagement with hobbyists, 3‑D‑printing experts, law enforcement and the attorney general's office to refine definitions and avoid chilling legitimate hobbyist activity; opponents said the bill still risks harming lawful businesses and hobbyists.

Staff announced a roll‑call of 8 ayes, 5 nays; by that tally the substitute was reported out of committee with a due‑pass recommendation.