Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County approves Bellevue Mountain Resort sketch plan with conditions after extensive hearing
Summary
Clear Creek County commissioners approved rezoning RZ2025-02 to a Planned Development for Bellevue Mountain Resort, a low-density resort and wedding venue, after a multi-hour hearing that focused on road access, maintenance, water supply, wildfire and wildlife protections and required conditions addressing easements, road improvements, water documentation and environmental studies.
The Clear Creek County Board of County Commissioners voted Dec. 16 to approve Resolution 25-84, clearing the Bellevue Mountain Resort sketch-plan rezoning (RZ2025-02) to a Planned Development district, subject to conditions the board and staff discussed during a multi-hour public hearing.
Staff recommended approval while enumerating outstanding issues to be resolved at the final plan stage: ensuring legal access and securing easements or alternative mitigation for Bellevue Mountain Drive; establishing road-right-of-way plans and maintenance agreements for Bellevue Mountain Drive and consideration of maintenance upgrades for Virginia Canyon Road and Lower 2 Brothers Road; documentation of a legal potable water source for cistern filling and required state permitting for wastewater treatment; geological hazards analysis; a wildfire mitigation plan; and finalized lists of permitted uses, signage and stormwater control.
Applicant team members described an ultra-low-density development across roughly 227 acres: an event lodge with a 200-seat capacity, a two-level parking deck, about 10 premium suites, 15 dispersed cabins, and a public 7-mile trail network. The applicants said the developed footprint would be limited to roughly 2.1–2.6% of the property (about four to five acres) and presented an economic-impact estimate projecting roughly $15.9 million annual economic activity and approximately $574,000 in county tax receipts (applicant estimate).
Public comment included neighbors who opposed routing large event traffic via Bellevue Mountain Drive — citing narrow, 12–16-foot sections, wildlife and wildfire risk, nighttime noise, and impacts to quality of life — and a Gilpin County representative who asked for coordination because much of the project traffic would use Gilpin roads. Planning staff and the applicant said the project team has secured a large majority of access easements for Bellevue Mountain Drive (reported as about 84%) and proposed engineering and legal approaches where easements cannot be obtained (realignment options, mitigation plans and maintenance agreements). Traffic consultants said peak-event trip generation is concentrated to specific days; staff recommended traffic counts and possible agreements for road improvements/maintenance as the final plan proceeds.
Commissioners debated fiscal impacts on county road maintenance, emergency response coordination with neighboring Gilpin County, wildlife review and the need for additional studies. After extended questioning of staff and the applicant, a commissioner moved to approve Resolution 25-84 with the modified conditions described on the record; the motion passed on a roll call of the board.
