Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

McHenry County board declines conditional-use petition, upholds ZBA recommendation

McHenry County Board · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended debate about easements, proximity to homes and emergency access, the county board voted not to approve a conditional-use petition (item 10b1), effectively upholding the Zoning Board of Appeals' recommendation to deny the request.

The McHenry County Board voted on Feb. 17 to deny a conditional-use petition (item 10b1) after members said the proposal failed to meet several approval standards and raised safety and access concerns.

Board member Smith moved to approve item 10b1; Collins seconded. Multiple board members, citing the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) findings, urged a no vote. "A no vote would uphold the ZBA's recommendation to deny," Board member Smith said, noting the petition was written in the affirmative and spelling out how the voting options would operate.

Board member Von Bergen, speaking from an agricultural perspective, said she supported family farms but concluded the parcel was not suitable for the requested use. "There are far too many challenges with this property, including the easement and close proximity to a residential subdivision," she said.

Board member Gotamoller said road access and emergency response were decisive issues. "I can't imagine taking fire trucks or emergency equipment through a cemetery in order to get to this property," he said, citing minimum road frontage and access concerns.

After discussion the clerk opened the vote; the motion did not carry, which leaves the ZBA denial in place. The transcript did not record a final roll-call tally by name for this specific motion.

What happened next: The board moved on to public comment and later business after the vote.

Why it matters: The decision preserves the ZBA recommendation and reflects county concern about land-use compatibility with neighboring residential areas and emergency-access requirements. It also demonstrates the board relying on ZBA findings when petition standards are not met.

Votes at a glance - Item 10b1 (conditional-use petition): Motion to approve motion failed; mover: Mister Smith; second: Mister Collins; outcome: denied (motion did not carry). Vote tally: not specified in transcript.

Next steps: The petitioner may revise the proposal or pursue other remedies outside the county board process; the ZBA's recommendation remains the controlling administrative record for this petition at this stage.