Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Lakeside budget review: LCFF entitlement, one-time recovery funds and facility needs highlighted
Loading...
Summary
At a study session, budget presenter Lisa Davis reviewed the district’s first-interim budget, citing an LCFF entitlement around $54,000,451, property-tax receipts near $14 million, one-time learning-recovery and student-support funds allocated mainly to TOSA positions, and near-term facilities and large-contract costs that will shape next fiscal years.
Lisa Davis presented the district’s first-interim budget and walked the board through revenue and expenditure drivers, one-time funds and looming contract and facility expenses.
Davis said the district’s LCFF entitlement for the current reporting period is approximately $54,000,451, with property-tax receipts of a little over $14,000,000 and nearly $1,000,000 of in-lieu property-tax apportionment flowing to charter schools. She explained LCFF is ongoing, unrestricted funding, while the state has been apportioning one-time recovery dollars (the learning recovery apportionment) across several years; Davis said the district’s apportionment was roughly $663,000 but is being divided across multiple years so the near-term receipt is about $221,008.15 for the current year.
The presentation detailed how the district proposes to use one-time funds: funding one TOSA (teacher on special assignment) and backfilling partial costs of other TOSA positions, with plans to prioritize restricted funds before dipping into the general fund. Davis noted educator-effectiveness funds expire 06/30/2026 and that student-support funds must be encumbered by 06/30/2029. She also pointed to upcoming large contract renewals (Achieve3000, Imagine Learning, NWEA, and later Seesaw and Amplify) and estimated carry-forward pressures: for example, Amplify could require substantial funding in 2027–28 and district projections will need to address that demand.
Davis outlined facilities needs — roofing and asphalt across sites, portable classroom siding, and two additional ESS (expanded learning) buildings at Riverview and Lemoncrest funded at about $1,700,000 for the ESS buildings — and said district general-fund contributions to Fund 40 will be required for maintenance and capital upkeep. She emphasized special‑education subsidy pressures (projected general‑fund contribution around $7.3 million) and warned that falling unduplicated counts could put several schools at risk of losing Title I eligibility in coming years.
Board members asked clarifying questions about acronyms and program specifics; Davis noted some figures are projections, some dollars are restricted, and salary negotiations remain incomplete so presented salary-based figures do not yet include potential negotiated increases. No formal budget votes were taken during the study session; staff will return with further detail in upcoming board meetings and the February interim cycle.
