Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenter questions $600,000 OM Advisors master plan contract

Upper Arlington City Council · December 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident told Upper Arlington City Council the proposed $600,000 OM Advisors master plan contract is excessive and urged the city to review prior consultant outcomes; council proceeded with the item and recorded a voice vote carrying the motion.

At the Dec. 8 Upper Arlington City Council meeting, resident Todd Jankres spoke during public comment to oppose aspects of the proposed contract with OM Advisors for a master plan update. Jankres told council that the contract amount listed in the materials is $600,000 and that it equates to roughly 3,000 hours or about $200 per hour. He urged the council to review what the city has implemented from prior consultant work and questioned whether the city needed another high-cost consultant given in-house expertise among staff and local professionals.

The council then called a vote on the ordinance authorizing the city manager to execute the contract. The transcript records a voice vote and that the motion carried; immediately after the recorded vote the transcript contains an inconsistent ordinance number (the item had been introduced as Ordinance No. 45-2025 but the vote language in the transcript references 44-2025). The report above uses the agenda identifier as introduced and notes the transcript numbering inconsistency.

The public comment raised two concrete points: the contract dollar amount ($600,000) and the commenter’s contention that prior consultant work has not always produced value sufficient to justify the expense. The transcript does not record a substantive response from council or staff during that public comment block beyond the regular vote call and the motion carrying. The council’s approval (voice vote) indicates the item proceeded; the contract administration and any implementation details will be handled by the city manager and planning staff per the ordinance, and any follow-up on consultant outcomes would depend on future requests or staff reports.

The meeting record does not include a detailed breakdown of the OM Advisors contract scope or deliverables; the commenter’s hourly and hours estimates were presented as his calculation during public comment.