Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pleasanton rezoning application withdrawn; county explains codes-complaint process
Summary
Planning staff reported that Eric and Emily Feese withdrew a rezoning and conditional-use application for 16349 Young Road, Pleasanton. County planning staff (Jacqueline) explained that, absent an active application, code complaints follow a standard investigation, notice and potential citation to codes court (judge-only fines).
Planning staff told the commission that the rezoning and conditional-use permit application filed by Eric and Emily Feese for 16349 Young Road in Pleasanton has been formally withdrawn and requires no further action from the board at this time.
Jacqueline (planning/codes staff) explained the county's codes-enforcement process in detail: a complaint is submitted to planning and zoning/codes enforcement, staff investigate, and if a violation appears the county issues a notice allowing time to become compliant. If compliance does not occur, staff can issue a citation and the matter proceeds to codes court (a judge-only proceeding handled by Judge Purvis). "Codes violations are not jailable. They are subject to sort of fine penalty type of a thing," Jacqueline said, and she emphasized that alleged violators have due process, including the option to retain counsel.
Jacqueline also noted that multiple duplicative complaints from the same person about the same issue do not change the investigative process. She told commissioners the process often resolves through compliance or additional time for legal response and that the first court appearance is rarely the final resolution.
Because the applicants withdrew, planning staff said the commissioners had no jurisdiction to act on the application; any remaining complaints about property conditions should proceed through the codes-enforcement procedure described.
