Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Engineer presents modified parking plan for large event site; board flags floodplain variance and SEQR steps

Town of Goshen Town Board · February 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Applicant's engineer Jason Pittengero presented a modified parking plan for 'Science of the Soul' that would create about 900 primarily grass parking spaces with stone aisles, shuttle areas and added entrance; the board flagged the need for a floodplain/impervious-surface variance and moved to assume SEQR lead agency and prepare Part 2 of the EAF.

Jason Pittengero, the applicant's engineer, presented a modified parking and site plan for a project representing Science of the Soul, saying the plan would provide approximately 900 spaces—largely grass-surfaced—with stone aisleways, an added entrance to meet frontage requirements and shuttle staging similar to prior arrangements at Strong Farm. Pittengero said the design aims to limit hard impervious surfaces and that the aisles would remain stone to maintain passability for emergency access.

Board members pressed technical questions: one member asked whether special district taxes in settlements were exempt (during the earlier tax discussion) and later members focused on the parking plan's floodplain implications, weekend usage patterns and whether future phase 2 expansion remains a possibility. Pittengero said the entire site lies within an environmental overlay zone and that the project will require a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals for impervious surface coverage; he added that underdrains and raised grade would be used to keep grass parking areas firmer during wet weather.

A member noted the EAF auto-populates certain DEC water-quality classifications, and Pittengero confirmed the EAF workbook and DEC data were referenced in the submitted materials. The board moved to assume lead agency, classify the matter for SEQR (the transcript references Type I classification due to acreage), and authorized the town consultant to prepare Part 2 of the EAF. The board set the SEQR public hearing timeline and noted any ZBA variance applications would be a separate step.

No final site approvals were granted at the meeting; the actions taken were procedural steps in the environmental review and application process.