Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Participants urge refinements to Pueblos halted participatory-budget pilot
Summary
Volunteer panelists who reviewed 100+ community proposals for a $1 million participatory-budget pilot told council the pilot produced useful local ideas (sidewalks, crosswalks, small park projects) but was undermined by timing, staff workload and political dispute; panelists recommended clearer rubrics, proposal workshops and district allocations if revived.
Get email alerts on the Community Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A volunteer review committee that evaluated more than 100 resident proposals for a 2024 participatory-budget pilot told the council the exercise produced practical, district-level ideas but needed better execution to avoid politicization and administrative friction.
Panel and purpose: Andrea Ames and Brett Stewart, members of the review committee, said the projectYour Idea, Your Neighborhoodwas designed to give residents ownership over how $1 million set aside in the 2024 budget would be spent on city-managed amenities. Committee members reviewed proposals against a rubric that tested whether a project was something government would do, feasibility, community benefit and equity.
What made the cut and what stalled: The committee recommended a spread of smaller projects so each district could have ownership: pedestrian safety improvements, tree trimming, small park enhancements, bus shelters and a proposed bike park. Panelists said roughly $86,000 of recommended projects were submitted to council, but subsequent actions and messaging led some volunteers and applicants to feel the process was politicized and ultimately stalled.
Panel recommendations: Panelists urged better timing (not over a holiday season), proposal workshops with departments to help applicants scope realistic projects, a clear rubric including economic impact measures, district-level allocations plus a citywide pot, and sustained communication so applicants know why proposals are accepted, deferred or redirected.
Next steps: Councilors responded with mixed views: some highlighted staff time and opportunity costs in a tight budget; others urged a retooled, lower-overhead volunteer committee approach that would preserve community engagement. Several councilors volunteered to participate in improved outreach and recommended integrating such efforts with existing neighborhood groups and commissions.

