Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Engagement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Participants urge refinements to Pueblos halted participatory-budget pilot

Pueblo City Council · February 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Volunteer panelists who reviewed 100+ community proposals for a $1 million participatory-budget pilot told council the pilot produced useful local ideas (sidewalks, crosswalks, small park projects) but was undermined by timing, staff workload and political dispute; panelists recommended clearer rubrics, proposal workshops and district allocations if revived.

A volunteer review committee that evaluated more than 100 resident proposals for a 2024 participatory-budget pilot told the council the exercise produced practical, district-level ideas but needed better execution to avoid politicization and administrative friction.

Panel and purpose: Andrea Ames and Brett Stewart, members of the review committee, said the projectYour Idea, Your Neighborhoodwas designed to give residents ownership over how $1 million set aside in the 2024 budget would be spent on city-managed amenities. Committee members reviewed proposals against a rubric that tested whether a project was something government would do, feasibility, community benefit and equity.

What made the cut and what stalled: The committee recommended a spread of smaller projects so each district could have ownership: pedestrian safety improvements, tree trimming, small park enhancements, bus shelters and a proposed bike park. Panelists said roughly $86,000 of recommended projects were submitted to council, but subsequent actions and messaging led some volunteers and applicants to feel the process was politicized and ultimately stalled.

Panel recommendations: Panelists urged better timing (not over a holiday season), proposal workshops with departments to help applicants scope realistic projects, a clear rubric including economic impact measures, district-level allocations plus a citywide pot, and sustained communication so applicants know why proposals are accepted, deferred or redirected.

Next steps: Councilors responded with mixed views: some highlighted staff time and opportunity costs in a tight budget; others urged a retooled, lower-overhead volunteer committee approach that would preserve community engagement. Several councilors volunteered to participate in improved outreach and recommended integrating such efforts with existing neighborhood groups and commissions.