Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State probation officials outline problem-solving court interlocal; York County hears program metrics
Summary
State court probation officials described the interlocal agreement that funds problem-solving courts (state pays staff; counties provide space) and reported local enrollments and outcomes; the board was briefed and told the Juvenile Diversion grant required signatures.
State probation officials briefed the York County Board of Commissioners on the interlocal agreement that governs problem-solving courts and explained how local and state roles are divided.
Bob Denton, deputy administrator for the Administrative Office of the Courts and Probation, said the state provides salaries, benefits, travel, training and transportation for problem-solving court staff while the county provides office space and operating equipment. "The state will provide all of the salaries, the benefits, travel, training, and transportation for all the staff of a problem solving court within a county," Denton said.
Adam Jorgensen, the statewide problem-solving court director, and local staff explained statutory and Supreme Court rule requirements for the courts, and pointed commissioners to standards posted on the Nebraska Supreme Court website. They also described the program types operating in the district — DUI court, mental-health court, reentry court and veterans treatment court — and how referral and screening work at the local level.
Local program data and outcomes: A local representative reported York County currently has 17 participants in the local problem-solving program and two participants from a neighboring county; the board heard that 15 people have graduated from the local program with two recidivism events among graduates.
Why it matters: Commissioners asked whether local teams can screen and decline referrals; officials confirmed local teams retain screening authority and the county attorney typically has final say on acceptance into the program. Officials said program fees collected from participants are used to fund treatment and program support.
Grant and next steps: The board also considered a juvenile diversion state grant related to the county’s work on diversion and rehabilitation. Rochelle Geiger presented the grant paperwork and the board moved to sign two juvenile diversion grant documents, including one award of $19,000; the motion passed by roll call.
The board asked staff to bring the interlocal agreement and any additional materials back to a May meeting for formal action if needed.
