Get email alerts on the Ordinance Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission sets Oct. 3 first readings for four ordinance amendments
Summary
The commission approved introductions and set Oct. 3 for second reading and adoption of amendments to four Mount Clemens ordinances covering blight, rental registration and inspection, water rules, and refuse collection; staff clarified applicability and limits for transfer-to-tax authority and special assessments.
The Mount Clemens City Commission voted to introduce amendments and set Oct. 3 for second reading and adoption of four proposed changes to local ordinances.
A commissioner moved to introduce and set for second reading an amendment to §19.003(e) of the city’s elimination-of-blight ordinance; another motion introduced an amendment to §16.204(c) of the rental-dwellings registration and inspection ordinance; the commission also introduced an amendment to the Mount Clemens Water Ordinance (transcribed as 25.116(c) section 6) and an amendment to §35.058(c) section 8 of the refuse-collection ordinance. Each motion was supported and advanced to the Oct. 3 meeting for second reading.
City staff and the city attorney explained that the transfer-to-tax eligibility they want to use excludes special assessments and identified four categories where tax transfers would be applicable; staff said if the city intends to use Community Development Block Grant funds for demolition or other actions it must own the property and apply for those funds.
All four introduction motions were advanced by voice/roll call; no ordinance text changes were adopted at first reading. The commission scheduled Oct. 3 for second readings and potential adoption.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
