Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oro Valley council approves code changes to mechanical screening and yard‑wall heights
Summary
Council approved ordinance O-26-05 to revise mechanical equipment screening and harmonize yard wall heights with the updated building code, allowing 5‑foot pool safety front walls and up to 7‑foot side/rear walls; staff said police and fire reviewed the changes and reported no objections.
The Oro Valley Town Council voted unanimously to adopt zoning-code amendments tightening clarity on mechanical-equipment screening and aligning yard-wall heights with the updated International Building Code.
Senior Planning Technician Patty Hayes outlined the proposed changes during a public hearing. Staff recommended replacing the fixed 4‑foot screening-wall requirement with a performance approach requiring a screening wall one foot taller than the equipment, and clarifying when an additional screen wall is required if equipment is more than 10 feet from an existing yard wall. Hayes also proposed applying screening guidance to rooftop mechanical units on new residential buildings so those installations are minimized from public view.
On yard walls, Hayes said the town’s zoning code previously allowed front-yard walls up to 4½ feet while the current building code (effective Jan. 1) requires 5 feet for pool‑safety barriers; the amendment permits a 5‑foot front‑yard wall when it functions as a pool safety barrier. The code change also raises the allowed side and rear yard wall height from 6 feet to 7 feet to align with the building code, and clarifies that yard‑wall height does not include underlying retaining walls.
Councilmember Nicholson asked about costs for homeowners when rooftop screening is required; Hayes clarified the rooftop guidance applies to new construction only and does not require replacing or retrofitting existing rooftop equipment. Police and fire staff reported they were consulted and raised no operational concerns.
Vice Mayor Barrett moved approval of Ordinance O‑26‑05; Councilmember Murphy seconded. The ordinance passed on a voice vote, recorded as 6‑0.
The ordinance is intended to remove costly conflicts between zoning and building codes and to provide clearer, equipment‑sensitive screening standards for homeowners and developers.
