Commission seeks clarification on proposed stream‑buffer language in comprehensive‑plan criteria
Commissioners questioned proposed criterion G, which would require buffers on USGS perennial streams for non‑agricultural development, and agreed to research whether the rule applies to subdivisions, forestry operations or other land uses before revising the plan.
The full story
A Planning Commission member asked for clarification of criterion G in the comprehensive‑plan update, which references buffers along USGS perennial streams for "non‑agricultural development." The member said the phrase was unclear and could be interpreted to apply to subdivisions, forestry operations or residential developments.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in