Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheatham County approves budget amendments and authorizes up to $5 million loan for public works
Summary
The county approved multiple budget amendments (general fund, sanitation, school insurance and technology) and authorized borrowing up to $5 million through the Public Building Authority of the City of Clarksville to fund public works projects.
Get email alerts on the County Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheatham County commissioners on Oct. 16, 2017 approved a set of budget amendments across county funds and authorized borrowing of up to $5 million to finance public works projects.
Director of Accounts Sandrine Batts presented County General Fund amendments covering Animal Control ($3,302.27), Ag Extension ($204.33) and the Health Department ($12,243.40); the body approved those changes by roll call (11 Yes, 0 No, 1 Absent). The commission also approved a Solid Waste/Sanitation Fund amendment allocating $29,000 to sanitation management and a General Purpose School Fund transfer of $970,397 to cover 2018 insurance increases; the school technology line item of $31,407.21 was also approved. Recorded roll-call tallies for these items are in the meeting minutes.
On the borrowing matter, a motion by Tim Williamson to authorize Cheatham County to borrow funds and incur taxable indebtedness not to exceed $5,000,000 through the Public Building Authority of the City of Clarksville for certain public works projects passed by roll call (10 Yes, 1 No, 1 Absent). A follow-up motion to approve execution and delivery of the loan agreement, permit issuance of a taxable bond by the Public Building Authority and related matters passed by roll call (11 Yes, 0 No, 1 Absent). The minutes do not specify which specific public works projects will be funded from the loan proceeds.
The county’s motions set budget adjustments and a borrowing authorization but do not record implementation timelines or project-level funding allocations; those appear to be follow-up administrative steps for county staff and the mayor’s office.
