Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council accepts MCDC’s $10 million commitment for Heritage Park, approves authorization 6–1

Midlothian City Council · January 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council recorded a Midlothian Community Development Corporation commitment of up to $10 million toward Heritage Park improvements; members pressed for cost and funding clarity (GMP pending), and the council voted 6–1 to accept the MCDC commitment and identify funding sources while noting further approvals will be required before spending.

The Midlothian City Council on Jan. 27 accepted a commitment from the Midlothian Community Development Corporation (MCDC) to allocate up to $10,000,000 toward improvements at Heritage Park, voting 6–1 after an extended discussion about funding mechanics and project costs.

Melissa, representing MCDC, said the board had discussed funding options, heard from their bonding company and agreed the board could support up to $10 million; she asked council to note the board’s commitment so that the project’s schedule and procurement could proceed. Melissa said the board could use reserves, bonding or a staggered payment plan similar to prior projects.

Several council members sought clarity about how the $10 million would be delivered and what portion of the park’s total cost it would cover, because the city has not yet finalized a guaranteed maximum price (GMP). One council member said he was concerned about committing large public funds before the GMP and bid results are available; another noted the authorization does not itself spend funds and that the council will have future opportunities to approve bonds or contracts before money is disbursed.

City staff said plans are over 90% complete and the construction manager at-risk (CMAR) is preparing a GMP; they expect a GMP in mid-February and potential contract action in March or April. Council discussion emphasized identifying funding 'buckets' now so the council can have an informed conversation when the GMP arrives.

After discussion Mayor Pro Tem Whitcliffe moved to approve as presented; Councilwoman Hammonds seconded. The motion carried 6–1. Staff and MCDC representatives said that final funding decisions and any bond issuances will require separate council approval and that no funds will be spent until those steps occur.