Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mendon council votes to deny Eugene Olsen annexation after fire-flow study

Mendon City Council · February 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Mendon City Council voted unanimously to deny an annexation for property owned by Eugene Olsen after a city engineer reported the site’s measured fire flow fell short of the 1,000 gpm standard used for service capacity.

Mendon — The Mendon City Council voted 5–0 on Feb. 12 to deny an annexation petition for property owned by Eugene Olsen after the city’s engineering review found the site could not be reliably served by the city’s water system.

City Engineer Eric Dursteler presented a fire-hydrant flow calculation showing roughly 945 gallons per minute for the Olsen property, below the 1,000 gallons-per-minute threshold the city uses for fire-flow capacity. Dursteler told the council that fire flow can vary by about 200 gallons per minute and recommended the council not approve the annexation because the city “does not have the capacity to push the water that far north to serve the Eugene Olsen property.”

Following Dursteler’s recommendation, Councilmember Brian Myers moved to not approve the annexation; Councilmember Amy Garbe seconded the motion. The councilmembers present — Myers, Garbe, Watkins, Heers and Jepsen — voted aye and the motion passed.

The council’s action was procedural: it rejected the annexation request based on the city’s current infrastructure capacity. No alternate mitigation or staged annexation plan was recorded in the minutes at the time of the vote. The applicant joined by Zoom but arrived after the vote had already been taken, according to the minutes.

Next steps were not specified in the meeting record. The council did not set a rehearing date in the minutes.