Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Zoning board approves Waste Management's excavation and wetland-buffer variance at 14 Taylor Avenue

Rochester Zoning Board of Adjustment · March 11, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The zoning board granted Waste Management of New Hampshire a special exception to resume earth excavation at 14 Taylor Avenue and approved a related variance to work inside the 75-foot wetland buffer (to a 50-foot limit); the applicant said material would be used on-site and the conservation commission voted favorably.

The zoning board voted to grant Waste Management of New Hampshire both a special exception to allow earth excavation at 14 Taylor Avenue and a variance to permit work inside the 75-foot wetland buffer.

A company representative said the project will not remove trees or affect wetlands and that any material removed would be reused on Waste Management's properties rather than sold commercially. "We're not proposing cutting any trees. We're not proposing to impact any wetlands," the representative said.

The applicant noted it had presented the project to the conservation commission, which provided a letter in the board packet and voted favorably on the proposal. City planning staff reviewed the special-exception criteria and explained the excavation would operate with access across an adjacent Waste Management-owned parcel.

During the hearing, board members examined mapped wetland buffers and asked whether the proposed work would fall 50 feet from the wetlands, the limit requested. After closing the public hearing on the special-exception portion, the board recorded a roll-call vote granting the special exception. The board then considered a separate variance request (D26-5) to allow excavation within the 75-foot buffer and approved that variance on motion and roll-call vote.

Board members emphasized the approvals were tied to the materials presented and the site-specific conditions; no tree removal or third-party sale of material was authorized by statements the applicant made at the hearing. The approvals include the applicant's representations and any conditions the planning staff may have placed in their memo; the board did not add further conditions on the record at the meeting.

The applicant and staff closed the matter with procedural direction to follow any permitting steps required by other agencies before work begins.