Get email alerts on the Government Operations Timekeeping topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parmer County court rejects paying for extra timeclock implementation hours after interface issues
Summary
Treasurer Sharon May told the court the county’s time clock vendor (TCP) requested more implementation hours because the NetData (i3verticals) interface is not yet functioning; a motion to pay for 10 additional hours failed on a 2–2 vote.
County Treasurer Sharon May told the Parmer County Commissioner's Court that the county’s time clock vendor had requested additional implementation hours because the interface with NetData (i3verticals) was not yet working and the system could not process sheriff’s office hours alongside courthouse employees. Judge Isabel Carrasco moved to pay for 10 additional prepaid hours; Commissioner Kirk Frye seconded. The motion failed with two ayes and two nays.
Why it matters: staff said the interface deficiency prevents consolidated payroll tracking for sheriff’s deputies and courthouse staff. The court did not approve the extra hours at this meeting, leaving the vendor issue unresolved.
What’s next: No follow-up direction was recorded at the March 10 session; the item may return to a future agenda if staff or vendors present new information.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
